• Home
  •  

    Explanation Why How What Caused Ice Age Climate Change Meteorological Factors Reasons Much More Snowfall Rainfall Oceanic Surface Sea Temperatures Elevation Warm Water Circulation Currents Biblical Proof Causation Book Genesis Veracity Foundation

    July 15th, 2012

    Ask ten meteorologists what caused the Ice Age and you might get ten different answers, it’s that confusing to mainstream scientists who don’t believe what’s written in the book of Genesis.  Almost all will say that it was colder back then, but really?  If it were colder in the Arctic, even less snow would fall there, now technically a desert because the snowfall is so slight (the cold atmosphere able to hold little moisture), so what would have caused a warmer atmosphere in the Arctic for more moisture there?

    Clear skies dominate in the super-cold regions, dense cloudcover ‘though having ruled the day during the Ice Age, now think what would have caused dense cloudcover for much more snow in the Arctic?  Obviously if the ocean had been warmer, much more evaporation off it would have built dense cloudcover, and of course that warmer ocean must have been heated from below, so Noah’s Flood is staring the biblical skeptics in the face, the only viable candidate, a warmer ocean heated from below.

    The “fountains of the deep” produced the water for Noah’s Flood, through the midoceanic ridges, the rift zones between the continents when the supercontinent Pangea broke apart during the flood by runaway plate tectonics explained here ttp://globalflood.org, so in the aftermath the ocean was much warmer than today, the engine for the Ice Age.  There is no other explanation but a warmer ocean having been heated from below having been the cause of the Ice Age, think long and hard about it.

    When the ocean had cooled to about today’s temperatures, by circa 1500 b.c., of course the dense global cloudcover dissipated, then much wamer summers and colder winters, explaining the flooded out then frozen carcasses of thousands of large mammals along the Arctic ocean coastline, and now do you see how the Bible explains so much which the bibliophobes cannot explain?  We hope you present this logic to your professors and other scientific skeptics of biblical history, it might make believers of them, all referring to http://genesisveracityfoundation.com, the science of the future, old school man!


    Stumbling Blocks Unbelievers Atheists What Prevents People From Coming Believe Belief Bible Mainstream Science Peer Pressure Traditional Darwinism Biblical History Supposed Mythology Legends Scientific Facts Supporting Archaic Book Genesis Veracity Foundation

    July 14th, 2012

    Do you think some people in scientifc circles are afraid to say they are Christians because their peers will laugh saying “oh yeh Noah’s Flood?”  Therefore, does it not seem reasonable to assume that many lay people don’t want to be associated with a book of supposed mythology, so they refuse Jesus Christ’s offer of forgiveness because they don’t want to be laughed at?  Makes sense, just human nature.

    But when the template of biblical history is demonstrated far superior to the really specious darwinian model, don’t you know the professionals in science are emboldened to openly profess their faith, and so lay people, seeing leaders in science speaking out that all of the Bible is true, are much more likely to call on the name of the Lord to be saved?

    Soon the general condition of scientific thought might well be that only the ignorant don’t see the veracity of all the Bible, the book of Genesis in particular, explaining so much about which dogmatic mainstream science is now clueless; dragons in history (http://genesispark.com), global flood geology (http://globalflood.org), and the actual cause of the Ice Age (http://genesisveracityfoundation.com), the science of the future, old school man, so help us spread the word.


    Inerrancy Biblical Scriptures Proof Texts Bible Book Genesis Valid Ancient History Archaeological Studies Real Geological Logic Anthropology Evidence College Courses Universities Religion Departments Reading Assignments Advanced Degrees Science Holy Torah

    July 14th, 2012

    Let’s presume for just a moment that the history recorded in the Bible is authentic, so now then shouldn’t we expect to see a plethora of evidence that it’s all true, despite the manic protestations by darwinian accolytes that bibical history is mere mythology?  Did you know that wild Charles Darwin’s term species has no animal classification value genetically, but that syngameons (biblical kinds) does?  So darwinism out the window.

    The Bible provides the ancestral template in Genesis 10 for the ancient civilizations of Elam, Canaan, the Pelasgians (Peleg), the Arameans (Aram), the Cimmerians (Gomer), Thracians (Tiras), Elysians (Elisha), Ionians (Javan), the Sidonians (Sidon), and with Plato’s help even the Atlanteans, whose namesake Atlas was a son of Posidon (Sidon son of Canaan), so how did the ancient Hebrews come up with all that unless it’s real history linked to the ancestries of the progenies of Noah and his wife?

    Skeptics often insist that legendary Noah’s Flood would have geologically been impossible, that global flood water could have not covered the high mountain ranges, yet since much of the geology of the mountains is sedimentary rock layers, having been deposited in water, logic dictates that the mountains rose at the close of the flood, as it was, runaway plate tectonics during the flood year (see http://globalflood.org), the flood water having slid off the risen continents into new ocean basins which were deepening at the close of the flood.

    Mainstream scientists are clueless about the cause of the Ice Age, clueless because they refuse to embrace the historicity of Noah’s Flood, yet when it’s realized that only a warmer ocean, having been heated from below, could have been the engine for all that evaporation for the dense global cloud formation for the huge volumes of Ice Age precipitation, then Noah’s Flood, the water for it having come from below, the “founatains of the deep,” is the obvious solution.  See http://genesisveracityfoundation.com, the science of the future, old school man!


    Supposed Reasons Facts Evidence Why Bible Biblical History Fables Mythology False Bad Wrong Scriptural Inerrancy Information Life Incarnation Jesus Christ Old Testament Prophecies Fulfillment Manifestation Book Genesis Veracity Foundation Science Future

    July 12th, 2012

    Atheists (who ‘though cannot prove that Elohim of the Bible does not exist) and other skeptics often say that the Bible is just old mythology written to control populations, supposedly all lies made up by conniving arbiteurs of history.  So who was behind the ancient writing of the “bad history” of the Old Testament all the way back to Genesis, and was the life of Jesus during his incarnation just all made up?

    Why did Christianity rapidly blossom from Jerusalem, there the earliest believers mostly Jews, if Jesus did not die and then resurrect as recorded in the New Testament?  Did all those martyrs from that time die really for nothing?  Since skeptics today say that the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ is a fraud, don’t you think the Jews who were alive at the time would better have known that than ignorant skeptics today?

    We know that the New Testament scriptures have not been changed for two thousand years (except in some modern translations surely bent on destroying the message), and the Dead Sea Scrolls from circa 200 b.c., where all of the books of the Old Testament but the book of Esther are represented, demonstrate that the scriptures of the Old Testament have not changed, so on what basis do the skeptics today say the scriptures were made up by conspirators for bad history?

    Supposedly where in the Old Testament is wrong history?  Can you name a biblical generation before which you think false history is recorded?  If you think you can name a generation, then what’s supposedly wrong with the historicity of the father of that person you may name?  So you say it’s all bad history?  Then why is the Table of Nations a fantastically accurate template of the ancient people groups confirmed by archaeology?  Read much more here http://genesisveracityfoundation.com, think about it.


    Prehistoric American Civilizations Transatlantic Ice Age Navigation Voyages Atlantis Empire Maps Ancient Sea Kings Charles Hapgood Anomalous Cartography Archaic Maritime Ocean Continents Mapping Timeline Timekeeping Biblical History Nautical Mile System

    July 10th, 2012

    Charles Hapgood wrote The Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings almost fifty years ago (1966), incorporating the assistance of U. S. Air Force personel to document that medieval maps (copied from ancient source maps) such as the Piri Reis Map, showing coastlines of South America and Antarctica, were precise far beyond the capability of medieval navigators, not to mention that Antarctica was supposedly not discovered until 1818 by the Russians, yet mainstream science has ignored the work because surely it destroys darwinian notions, proving that the ancients indeed settled the Americas mostly by sea, from Atlantis for instance, namesake of Atlas, the map man said to have held the earth on his shoulder.

    The Piri Reis Map shows an arc of five equidistant reference loci in the Atlantic, the radii of that arc pointing back to Syene (Aswan), Egypt, the southern edge of the Egyptian empire not coincidentally on the Tropic of Cancer latitude, and the arc extended northerly off the map would pass directly through the North Pole, absolutely impossible to have achieved without accruate timekeeping, that method not deduced by Hapgood and his team, yet here now http://genesisveracityfoundation.com/earth-measure-geometry is how they did it, having measured and thereby mapped the earth by the wobble rate of its axis, the precession rate.

    The pioneering academic Hapgood was certain many of the ancient source maps were drawn early in the Ice Age, because the mountain ranges of Antarctica, now under thousands of feet of snow and ice, are drawn with geographic accuracy, impossible to have charted but before all that snow and ice had built up, which according to the darwinian timeline would have been hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of years ago, so now you see why they don’t want to talk about it.  But with the biblical model, it all makes sense, the warmer ocean after Noah’s Flood having been the engine for the Ice Age, the science of the future, old school man!


    Answers Skeptics Rationales Excuses Facts Reasons Atheists Believe Bible Biblical History Inerrancy Holy Scriptures Proofs Evidence Theories Flood Bronze Ice Age Ancient Navigation Submerged Ruins Darwinian Timeline Falsified Book Genesis Veracity Foundation

    July 9th, 2012

    The most uneducated and scientifically disinclined among us can easily flummox the most sophisticated darwinists by attacking their timeline which posits the end of the Ice Age at circa 10000 b.c.  During the Ice Age, much more rain fell where now are deserts, therefore, because many ancient bronze age ruins are now in the midst of stark deserts, those cities built circa 2000 b.c., obvious is the fact that the Ice Age ended after those cities were built.

    And considering the hundreds of submerged sites of bronze age ruins found on the shallow continental shelves in many far-flung parts of the world (see http://genesisveracityfoundation.com/submerged-ruins-atlantis), many of those ruins megalithic, and some of huge cities such as in the Gulf of Chambay off India, that the Ice Age ended actually circa 1500 b.c. becomes even more apparent, the darwinists unable to refute this evidence and logic, try it on some of them!

    The cause of the Ice Age still puzzles those of the darwinian bent, yet simple hydrology dictates that the ocean was warmer during the Ice Age, having been heated from below, for all the evaporation which caused the dense global cloudcover for all that snowfall in the extreme latitudes and higher elevations, and all the rainfall which fell where now are deserts, doesn’t that make sense?

    Of course Noah’s Flood, the water for it from “the fountains of the deep,” in its aftermath was the engine for the Ice Age, the mountians having risen at the close of the Flood, so when you grasp these simple concepts, those who mock the biblical account will be silenced, perhaps even leading them to come to believe that the Bible is true history, all the way back to the Garden of Eden, which was obliterated in Noah’s Flood, now buried beneath thousands of feet of sedimentary rock.


    History Eusebius Plato Flood Ogyges Atlantis Timeline Correlation Book Exodus Jews Egypt Kings List Athens Cecrops Erechtheus Egyptian Voyages Bronze Ice Age Climate Change Submerged Ruins Greece Timaeus Critias Technology Farming Mining Atlantean Legends

    July 9th, 2012

    The ancient greek historian Eusebius wrote that the Flood of Ogyges which consumed much of Greece occurred at the time of the Exodus of the Jews out of Egypt circa 1450 b.c., so you’d think Plato would  have mentioned that flooding by the sea, legendary in all of Greece, in his writing about the history of Atlantis, the dialogues with Critias and Timaeus, wherein they reported that when Atlantis was flooded, so too was much of Greece, a great rise of the sea level.

    In the story, Atlantis was a bronze age empire with trireme ships for global navigation and mining for gold, silver, copper, and tin, the latter two integral components for bronze production, the alloy begun to have been produced circa 2200 b.c. all archaeologists agree, so Plato’s date for the submergence of Atlantis at circa 9600 b.c. is clearly far askew, he having neglected to correlate the Flood of Ogyges to end the bronze age with the flooding of Atlantis, a bizarre miscalculation indeed.

    Adding insult to injury is that Plato wrote of the greek kings Erechtheus, Cecrops, Erysichthon, and Theseus, havng lived in the timeframe that Atlantis (and much of Greece) went under, those ancient kings having re-established order and city building in the aftermath of the flood, those kings acknowledged by all to have lived circa 1300 b.c., so is it not strange that Plato did not put two and two together, or did he really think those kings lived 9,000 years before his time?

    Submerged off Greece are a multitude of megalithic ruins of bronze age cities, such as off Psathoura, Pavlopetri, Astakos, Abdera, and Platygiali, falling in line with the bronze age timeline of the Flood of Ogyges, clearly the same flood as of Atlantis (and much of Greece in Plato’s rendition), so we can forgive Plato for his strange oversight, but now with nautical archaeology and these clear facts of history at our disposal, it’s clear that the Ice Age ended at the time of the Exodus.  Read much more about all this at http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.


    Ancient History Origin Reason Sumerian Babylonian Calendar Week Length Number Seven Days Evil Epic Creation Story Enuma Elish Mythology Bible Biblical Six Days Rest Seventh Day Sabbath Chronology Book Genesis Veracity Foundation Evidence Proof Science

    July 8th, 2012

    Academic mockers of the claims and history in the Bible haven’t really thought things through.  They say the story of Noah’s Flood, about a year in total duration, was copied from the seven day globally cataclysmic flood of babylonian legend, with the other stories in the hebrew book of Genesis supposedly too having been copied from the Babylonians (the Sumerians their precursors), yet the babylonian creation story has no six days of creation (the seventh day for rest).

    But the babylonian calendar included the “days of evil,” the 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th days of the month, when people were precluded from certain endeavors, the 28th day their only “day of rest,” so since it’s not from their own original legends, these every seven days of “evil,” then clearly the seven day blocks were co-opted from the hebrew history recorded in the Bible, that history back to Adam and Eve recorded by eyewitnesses (http://GenesisVeracity.com/Articles/Article13.htm).

    So because a global flood lasting only seven days from beginning to end, considering the dynamics of the flood (see http://globalflood.org), is certainly far too short a duration, and since the babylonian seventh “days of evil” were clearly lifted from the the Bible, a bastardized form of the seventh day of rest, it’s clear that the babylonian legends and calendar were modeled yet bastardized forms after the history in the Bible, so now read more about historical truth at http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.


    Atheists Naturalism Hypocritical Admonishment Keep Your Religious Beliefs Private To Yourself Faith Bible Biblical Christian Young Earth Creationism Darwinism Intellectual Honesty Double Standard Models Atheism Academic Freedom Origins Earth Universe Genesis

    July 6th, 2012

    Because atheists cannot prove that the creator Elohim does not exist, doesn’t that make atheism a faith movement?  And because darwinism is a theory at best, a flimsy hypothesis at worst, predicated on the notion that all has evolved, not created, then does that model not fall plainly into the category of faith ‘though dogmatically taught as solid science in the public schools?  So is atheistic darwinism not a religion taught as science?

    Atheists tell biblical young earth creationists to “keep your religion to yourself,” but science and archaeology actually bear out the history recorded in the Bible, demonstrable for all to see for instance here http://genesisveracityfoundation.com, so because atheistic darwinism is clearly a faith with no real evidentiary support, why do we allow that one model of faith to dominate in academia?

    When learned young earth creationists face off against darwinists in debate, the creationists almost invariably come out smelling like a rose, yet such free intellectual honesty and discourse is not allowed to our students in school, for fear by the academic elites that the students will see the obvious merits of the biblical model, what is said to be mythology and bad science, blacklisted for clearly specious reasons.


    Christian Evangelism Scare Tactics Threat Real Hell Intended Fallen Angles Lake Fire Avoidance Warnings Messiah Jesus Christ Children God Heaven Born Again Experience Reality Destiny Personal Choice Volition Holy Standards Blood Sacrifice Necessity Faith Gospel

    July 3rd, 2012

    Atheists (who ‘though really can’t prove there is no creator) are angry with God for saying those who reject Jesus Christ will spend the rest of their eternity in hell, but God created hell for the fallen angels, so all humans who confess their sin and ask for forgiveness will be saved, too much to ask of the atheists I guess, who we all know are very proud.

    The fallen angels wanted no part of God, thinking they could handle things better themselves, so hell is actually the absense of God, no love, no peace, no rest, what the fallen angels wanted, but do you too want that?  Jesus spoke of literal hell many times, truly to scare people, letting them know what happens to the followers of Satan, his children all who reject God’s sacrifice on the cross to pay the price for our sins committed.

    Why spend eternity in hell when salvation is a free gift?  It’s easy, call on the name of the Lord (with repentent heart) and you will be saved, simple as that, do it now.  Being a child of God is a privileged position avalaible to all.  Jesus suffered agony on the cross, so he knows what separation from the Father is like, he’s been there, warning us many times in the New Testament to not send ourselves to hell.

    And if you’re wondering how the book of Genesis could be true, the foundational book of the Bible for all the history and teachings which follow, then be sure to read http://genesisveracityfoundation.com, the science of the future, old school man.  Because after all, if real history is not recorded in Genesis, then where in the Bible, if anywhere, does real history begin to be recorded?