• Home
  •  

    Sarah Palin’s Creation Science not Political Liability Alternative Archaeology Underwater Ruins Investigations Legitimate Good Science Confirming Genesis Rendering Sarah Palin Favors Open and Honest Intellectual Discourse Questioning Theoretical Darwinism and Materialistic Gradualism

    Republican vp selection Sarah Palin is beginning to be criticized for being a creationist, having taught her kids the evidences for creationism in conjunction with the traditional darwinian teachings, to compare and contrast the relative merits of the two models, for open and honest critical analysis, to enhance the learning experience by teaching kids to look objectively at scientific problems, to look at evidence from all possible angles.  And one topic of inquiry which mainstream archaeologists have ignored is the presense of submerged megalithic ruins in many parts of the world, bronze age ruins, which were consumed by the end-of-the-ice-age sea level rise, by the evidence, not circa 10000 B.C., as mainstream scientists maintain, but around 1500 B.C., to rationalize the expert stone-masonry of many of these now submerged ruins, corroborated by ancient legends about that sea level rise, and with the drying worldwide which is known to have occured in that timeframe, when the Ice Age ended.

    Graham Hancock has made a small fortune off documenting and researching the legends about many of these ruins, but his work is mostly ignored by mainstream archaeologists, because with their (and Hancock’s) time for the end of the Ice Age at 10000 B.C., that means sophisticated megalithic building must have been ongoing then, some 7,000 years before it is commonly thought to have begun, so the evidence favors a much later end for the Ice Age than popularly imagined, good science, but little discussed because it does not jibe with the darwinian scheme.

    I don’t know that Sarah Palin is a young earth creationist, but I bet she has presented such material to her kids along with the darwinistic material, for critical analysis, nothing wrong with that, but the darwinists insist on a monopoly on scientific thought in the schools, insisting that the earth and universe must be billions of years old, when the evidence is actually quite to the contrary.  See the free ebook download of my first book, Old Earth? Why Not!, to see that there are many great reasons to question the scientific dogma now monopolizing our schools.

    And good research results from the creationist framework, such as the rediscovery of how the ancients accurately measured the earth, by the design of the universe, obviously, intelligent design, see article #2 at http://IceAgeCivilizations.com, to learn why the length of the egyptian royal cubit was not the distance from some pharoah’s elbow to fingertip.

    Comments are closed.