• Home

    Animal Classification Systems Bible Science Embryo Development Growth Similar Analogous Analogy Darwinian Evolution Ernst Haeckel Fraud Forgeries Conviction Drawings Pictures Depictions Trial Jena University Art Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny Charles Darwin Social Darwinism Engineering Racism Origin Species Label Homo Stupidus Descent Man Phylogenetic Tree Morphology Organisms Human Race Natural History Creation Books Ernst Haeckel Tadpoles Tails Survival Fittest Term Syngameons Meaning God Created Biblical Kinds Natural Selection Genesis Veracity Foundation Old Science Future Man

    The german biologist and staunch advocate of ridiculous darwinism in the late 1800’s, Ernst Haeckel, foolishly proponed that the development of embryos is reminiscent of the darwinian evolution of the so-called species, for instance a frog embryo growing gradually to tadpole then to frog, this supposedly proof that fish-like creatures (the tadpole) had evolved into frogs over millions of years, nonsense still taught in many textbooks today.  Haeckel was convicted of fraud and forgery at Jena University for his trumped up drawings of the supposed transitional creatures, and Haeckel’s darwinian phylogenetic tree included homo stupidus (just below homo sapien), that’s right folks, homo stupidus, which he called “true but ignorant man!”  Do they tell you that in our halls of higher learning?  Haeckel wrote:

    “A grim and ceaseless struggle for life is the real mainspring of the purposeless drama of world history.  We can only see a ‘moral order’ and ‘design’ in it when we ignore the triumph of immoral force and the aimless features of the organism.  Might goes before right as long as the organism exists.”  (Haeckel, The Evolution of Man, p. 88)

    Charles Darwin in his book Descent of Man praised the work of Haeckel (homo stupidus and all!), adding to Haeckel’s social darwinism, that might is right, certainly license for racism and genocide in saying:

    “With savages, the weak in body and mind are soon eliminated and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health.  We civilized men (and women), on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination, we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick . . .  thus the weak members of civilized societies propagate their kind.  No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man . . . hardly anyone is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals (homo stupidus?) to breed.”  (Darwin, Descent of Man, p. 501)

    Darwinists today say that their “science” is not racist, but when you read the writings of Darwin and Haeckel (such as noted above), who can say that whomever are deemed to be the smartest and fittest should be the reproducers by social engineering (and genocide), according to darwinism, the others whom are not deemed superior left with no families nor even any life at all?  But the Bible, the Word, calls us the human kind, the human syngameon in modern biological parlance, all interfertile and so of one created kind, just as lions and tigers can breed, not “races” of cats, but members of one created syngameon, the biblical template rendering darwinism ridiculous and destructive.  Read more about the real history of ancient humankind at http://genesisveracityfoundation.com, the science of the future, old school man.

    Comments are closed.